Winrar For Xp 2002' title='Winrar For Xp 2002' />Zip vs Win. Zip vs Win. RAR vs Windows Compression. Need to compress a bunch of files and want to know which compression format is the best Which program will give you the smallest fileWell, the answer is a bit more complicated than that. Yes, for any set of data, one program will always give you the best compression and the smallest file, but depending on the data, it may not be the same program every time. In addition, there are other factors to consider beyond file size. As youll see, sometimes the difference between two compression utilities is quite small, but the format can make a big difference. Plus, some are free and others cost money, so if you are budget conscious, then it reduces your choices easily. In this article, Ill go through four different compression tools and try to give you the advantages and disadvantages for each. Beyond these four, there are many other options, but I found these to be the most popular and well known by most people. Real World Compression Test. First, lets just look at straight compression numbers because thats always fun. For my tests, I decided to create a test folder with a bunch of data in various formats. I dont like just compressing images or just compressing documents because the differences end up being very small and its hard to choose a clear winner. In my case, I took 1. GBs of videos different formats, images RAW and other formats, documents PDF, Office files, etc and music files MP3, M4. A, etc and passed them through each compression utility with default settings. First, lets start with the setup I have and the versions. Im using a Windows 7 PC with Service Pack 1 and I installed the latest versions of each program as of the date of this post 7 Zip 1. Win. Zip version 2. Win. RAR x. 64 5. In addition to the built in Windows 7 compression, Im also going to run the same set of data on Windows 1. Windows. OK, lets check the results below. Windows 7 ZIP  1. Fake Drivers License Maker here. GB 1. 7. 6 reductionWindows 1. ZIP 1. 2. 1 GB 1. ZIP 1. 1. 1 GB 2. Win. Zip  1. 2. 0 GB 1. Win. RAR 1. 1. 6 GB 2. So Who Wins Well, in terms of just compression ability, 7 Zip is the clear winner. Zip has been around for a while and they have ranked at the very top for best compression utility on multiple third party tests, so the numbers are not really surprising. So should you go out and get 7 ZIP to zip your filesIt depends. The only issue with programs like 7 ZIP and Win. RAR, both of which did the best in compression, is that they use proprietary formats that are not fully supported on other systems. In order for someone to open a 7 ZIP or Win. XnView. XnView is freeware software that allows you to view and convert graphic files. Its very. Version v1. WinSnap. WinSnap is a small enhancement utility. RAR file, they will need to download and install the appropriate software on their machines first. If you are compressing data for yourself, then it doesnt really matter which format you use. However,. 7z and. Windows, Mac and Linux. If compatibility is an issue, then I recommend using the built in compression in Windows. Win. Zip is another option, but the difference between built in Windows compression and Win. ZIP is minimal. Plus, Win. Zip will set you back at least 3. Also, the compression algorithm in Windows 7 seems to be exactly the same as in Windows 1. So whether you are using Windows 7, 8 or 1. Again, since. ZIP format can be opened on Windows, Mac, Linux and even Chrome. OS without any additional software, the built in Windows compression is the best choice for compatibility. If you need the smallest size possible, go with 7 Zip. If you have any questions, feel free to comment. RAR Password Recovery Crack lost passwords for a RARWinRAR archives, WinRAR Password Recovery. Information about Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7 and 8 including tweaks, slipstreaming, install, registry, and forum for all Windows versions.